Rewrite of a product where backward compatibility cannot be assumed. A higher version number might indicate a major Major: Assemblies with the same name but different major versions are The components are used by convention as follows: NET version number in their MSDN documentation for the Version class. Microsoft describes the purpose of each component of a. In case it is a fundamental problem it should be added to the Product backlog as it may require further analysis and discussion with the customer.Īnother good read is the TFS branching guide Now you may argue if it is safe to work directly against the Prod branch, think again, a P1 that requires immediate attention should not be a fundamental problem in the system.
Build number of latest mac office version code#
By applying the fix in any other branch and rolling out the changes to production you risk releasing semi-finished or untested code from the subsequent iterations. In this case the P1 should be fixed in the Prod branch. The P1 should be fixed in the branch that is closest to the code base running in Production.
In what branch should I fix the P1 (hotfix) ticket? See alsoįrom the FAQ section at TFS branching strategy: With SVN it becomes even simpler, because tags and branches are implemented exactly in the same way - a tag is nothing more than a branch located under /tags. In our case the CI tool creates a repository tag, so we always have the necessary information ready to use, when needed. This aspect becomes important when you want to be able to pick a particular build at any time after all the tests succeeded and promote exactly that version to the next official release of your product. The key difference between the two processes is, whether or not you want the ability to apply hotfixes to CI builds and thus, at which point in the process the branch is made. a revision of a particular daily build (that's what MS does).a product revision (that's how most people use it).commit number 4713: Alice fixed feature A in the 1.2.100 branch.commit number 4712: Bob modified feature B in trunk/master.commit number 4711: Alice added feature A to trunk/master.The sequence would therefore be as follows: The REVISION indicates additional "hot" changes applied to that BUILD branch. The BUILD number is not automatically incremented, instead it can be considered being kind of a release branch, to freeze the code used for a particular version of the code. If you want to stabilize the current branch, you may run into troubles as you never can't be sure whether or not Bob just added a bunch of bugs. commit number 4713: Alice fixed feature A (the "hotfix")Īs you can see, the hotfix is not the only change contained in the next build, also Bob's modification become part of that build.commit number 4712: Bob modified feature B.commit number 4711: Alice added feature A.The downside of that approach is, that we might get the following sequence of events: Incrementing REVISION, however, indicates a new permanent release branch, that's why we place it before BUILD.
Modules with same are considered interchangeable, and the BUILD tells you which one is the most recent.
For us, a hotfix is considered just another code change, and the BUILD part increases automatically with every CI run. Most people (myself included) use a semantic version numbering scheme where you just get a higher BUILD number whenever you have to make a new build for whatever reason.
The whole confusion stems from the different semantics that MS uses for "Build number" and especially "Revision".